I've already put my point of view as to the ins and outs, (honestly no pun intended), of this case.
One question I ask is, "Should the Scottish Government pay for a private prosecution given the fact that the Scottish judiciary threw the case out"?
I find it astounding that the word of a drunk woman is taken as true above the word of two equally drunk men to the extent that our taxes would pay for a retrial that has already been tried with the outcome being a promise that said Government office would not be revisiting the case.